blondedreamer26

Over the past century, women have gained substantial power in the political world. This is true for most countries, Canada certainly. However, I would have to say that women in politics adds a dimension of danger to the political structure of our country. This may not be a popular view, but I think something like politics is more of a man's domain than a women's- and I think that giving women the right to hold a position of power in politics could have serious negative affects. Im terrified imagining a country run by a women. Women just don't possess the same power or influence as men do. This is how its always been, and Im not sure why our country has been so set on changing the way things have always worked. Not to mention, having women in politics has a proven history of distracting male politicians (think Bill Clinton) and I don't think we need any more political scandals ensuing.

Question: Should women have the right to vote?

"Post Princess Models of Gender" was a piece that deeply disturbed me. As a young women in the 21st century, I know that I am supposed to want women's rights and border on feminist values. However, I don't see the need to change up traditional gender roles that have been in existence for thousands of years. What's wrong with a male dominated society? I don't see why any women would want a soft man. An example of traditional gender roles being mutilated in film could be Zoolander. Derek Zoolander took on the feminine profession of modelling, while the female journalist lead did all of the research and work in the film to save Zoolander. How exhausting for her! I must say that I think society would experience far less turmoil if we all just agreed to live in a man's world.

Food is the bread of life."Food Security" by Charles J. Godfray, point out quite bluntly that there are 9 billion people on this planet and they all need to eat. That's not taking into account the billions of other living life forms on this planet. Whatever can be done? Realistically, this mind blowing question offers few options for solving the food scarcity problem.

With little food available for the ever increasing population, I would have to say that the answer is quite clear. People who can afford to eat well should be able to eat well. People who cant afford it shouldn't be picky. After all, they are lucky to get food at all. There are lots of foods that are cheap and also healthy (lettuce, plants, bread). Having a choice in foods is nice, but at the end of the day its a luxury that most citizens don't have. Poor people need to be resourceful with their resources and band together to ensure that everyone is able to eat. First world people have their own share of problems. Poor people have very primitive problems. If they can focus their own efforts on finding something edible to keep them going then there will be enough food to go around.